CALENDAR

 MAIN MENU

ARTICLES

 

C.S. Lewis Quotes
Quotes on Goodness, Truth and Beauty

Quotes by C.S. Lewis and other Notable Christian Writers on Goodness, Truth and Beauty | CS Lewis Quotes


Quotes on Goodness, Truth and Beauty

Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free."
John 8:32

"I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else". 
C. S. Lewis

Truth is truth, whether it's spoken by the lips of Jesus or Balaam's donkey. George Macdonald

"It costs God nothing, so far as we know, to create nice things: but to convert rebellious wills cost Him crucifixion."
C. S. Lewis,
Surprised by Joy

If God exists and we are made in his image we can have real meaning, and we can have real knowledge through what he has communicated to us.
Francis Schaeffer

One might ask, "Well, then, how do skeptical scholars explain the facts of the resurrection appearances, the empty tomb, and the origin of the Christian faith?" The fact of the matter is, they don't. Modern scholarship recognizes no plausible explanatory alternative to the resurrection of Jesus. Those who refuse to accept the resurrection as a fact of history are simply self-confessedly left without an explanation.

These three great facts--the resurrection appearances, the empty tomb, and the origin of the Christian faith--all point unavoidably to one conclusion: The resurrection of Jesus. Today the rational man can hardly be blamed if he believes that on that first Easter morning a divine miracle occurred. 
William Lane Craig

It seems to me …that the lesson to be learned from the classical debate over miracles, a lesson that has been reinforced by contemporary scientific and philosophical thought, is that the presupposition of the impossibility of miracles should, contrary to the assumption of nineteenth and for the most part twentieth century biblical criticism, play no role in determining the historicity of any event. While many scholars still operate under such an assumption, there seems now to be a growing recognition that such a presupposition is illegitimate. The presupposition against the possibility of miracles survives in theology only as a hangover from an earlier Deist age and ought to be once for all abandoned.
William Lane Craig

[William Craig in response to a question from Lee Strobel] “I would argue that the hypothesis that God raised Jesus from the dead is not at all improbable. In fact, based on the evidence, it’s the best explanation for what happened. What is improbable is the hypothesis that Jesus rose naturally from the dead. That, I would agree, is outlandish. Any hypothesis would be more probable than saying the corpse of Jesus spontaneously came back to life.”

“But the hypothesis that God raised Jesus from the dead doesn’t contradict or any known facts of experience. All it requires is the hypothesis that God exists, and I think there are good independent reasons for believing that he does.”

With that, Craig added this clincher: “As long as the existence of God is even possible, it’s possible that he acted in history by raising Jesus from the dead.”
Lee Strobel, The Case for Easter

In the Incarnation, God the Son takes the body and human soul of Jesus, and, through that, the whole environment of Nature, all the creaturely predicament, into His own being. So that ‘He came down from Heaven’ can almost be transposed into ‘Heaven drew earth up into it’, and locality, limitation, sleep, sweat, footsore weariness, frustration, pain, doubt, and death, are, from before all worlds, known by God from within. The pure light walks the earth; the darkness, received into the heart of Deity, is there swallowed up. Where, except in uncreated light, can the darkness be drowned?
C.S. Lewis, Letters to Malcolm: Chiefly on Prayer

Every generation of Christians has this problem of learning how to speak meaningfully to its own age. It cannot be solved without an understanding of the changing existential situation which it faces. If we are to communicate the Christian faith effectively, therefore, we must know and understand the thought forms of our own generation.
Francis A. Schaeffer, Escape From Reason

Christianity is the greatest intellectual system the mind of man has ever touched.
Francis Schaeffer, Letter, March 2, 1959

Christianity believes that God has created an external world that is really there; and because He is a reasonable God, one can expect to be able to find the order of the universe by reason.
Francis A. Schaeffer,
Pollution and the Death of Man

A lie travels round the world, while Truth is putting on her boots.
Charles H. Spurgeon

"A great many of those who 'debunk' traditional...values have in the background values of their own which they believe to be immune from the debunking process."
C.S. Lewis, The Abolition of Man

"Whenever you find a man who says he doesn't believe in a real Right and Wrong, you will find the same man going back on this a moment later."

C.S. Lewis, The Case for Christianity

The Christian is the real radical of our generation, for he stands against the monolithic, modern concept of truth as relative. But too often, instead of being the radical, standing against the shifting sands of relativism, he subsides into merely maintaining the status quo. If it is true that evil is evil, that God hates it to the point of the cross, and that there is a moral law fixed in what God is in Himself, then Christians should be the first into the field against what is wrong.
Francis A. Schaeffer, The God Who is There

The biblical and continuing vision of Jesus was of one who made all of created reality and kept it working, literally “holding it together” (Col. 1:17). And today we think people are smart who make light bulbs and computer chips and rockets out of “stuff” already provided! He made “the stuff”.
Dallas Willard, The Divine Conspiracy

"Truth, even crucified and buried, still has a way of rising faith out of the grave, reasserting itself and challenging people to repentance and change."
Naim Stifan Ateek, Palestinian canon of St. George's Cathedral, Jerusalem

The proper question to be asked about any creed is not 'Is it pleasant?' but 'Is it true?'" 
Dorothy Sayers

Understanding is the reward of faith. Therefore seek not to understand that thou mayest believe, but believe that thou mayest understand.
Augustine, On the Gospel of
St. John

A thing is not necessarily true because badly uttered, nor false because spoken magnificently.
Saint Augustine

The emotional quality of what we moderns call our thought produces an extreme violence of conviction combined with extreme incoherence in our arguments.
Jacques Ellul

I aim tonight only at reversing the popular belief that reality is totally alien to our minds. My answer to that view consists simply restating it in the form: ‘Our minds are totally alien to reality.’ Put that way, it reveals itself as a self-contradiction. For if our minds are totally alien to reality than all our thoughts, including this thought, are worthless. We must, then, grant logic to the reality; we must, if we are to have any moral standards, grant it moral standards too. And there is really no reason why we should not do the same about standards of beauty. There is no reason why our reaction to a beautiful landscape should not be the response, however humanly blurred and partial, to a something that is really there. The idea of a wholly mindless and valueless universe has to be abandoned at one point-i.e. as regards logic: after that, there is no telling at how many other points it will be defeated nor how great the reversal of our nineteenth century philosophy must finally be.
C.S. Lewis, De Futilitate; in Christian Reflections

The simple step of a courageous individual is not to take part in the lie. One word of truth outweighs the world.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn

The individual needs the return to spiritual values, for he can survive in the present human situation only by reaffirming that man is not just a biological and psychological being but also a spiritual being, that is creature, and existing for the purposes of his Creator and subject to Him
Peter Drucker-- Landmarks of Tomorrow: A Report on the New 'Post-Modern' World (1959)

It becomes Christians to pray for peace and quiet, but not to abandon steadfast faith and truth, even at the peril of death.
Ambrose of Milan

Was not Jesus an extremist for love-Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, pray for them that despitefully use you. Was not Amos an extremist for justice-Let justice roll down like waters and righteousness like a mighty stream. Was not Paul an extremist for the gospel of Jesus Christ-I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus…So the question is not whether we will be extremist but what kind of extremist will we be…In that dramatic scene on Calvary’s hill, three men were crucified. We must not forget that all three were crucified for the same crime-the crime of extremism. Two were extremists for immorality, and thusly fell below their environment. The other, Jesus Christ, was an extremist for love, truth and goodness, and thereby rose above his environment.
Dr. Martin Luther king, Jr., Letter from Birmingham Jail

We are not taught much today that honestly means to seek truth in an absolute, fanatical way. Truth is no longer absolute, but is soft, squishy, and negotiable. Most Christians still do believe in an objective truth but don't see it as something to which we must be conformed. Truth has become merely one of the ingredients in their experience, one of the things they can use to obtain happiness.
Peter Kreeft

The closer we are to God, to divine attributes-such as absolute truth, goodness, and beauty-the more we wonder. When we separate ourselves from truth, goodness, and beauty, we lose wonder and become cynical. The Enlightenment was basically the narrowing of our vision to a purely scientific, empirical, rationalistic worldview, screwing down the manhole covers on us so we became squinting underground creatures.
Peter Kreeft

"No man knows how bad he is till he has tried very hard to be good."
C.S. Lewis

"Badness is only spoiled goodness."
C.S. Lewis, The Case for Christianity

"Bad cannot succeed even in being bad as truly as good is good. If all Hell’s miseries together entered the consciousness of yon wee yellow bird on the bough there, they would be swallowed up without trace, as if one drop of ink had been dropped into that Great Ocean to which your terrestrial Pacific itself is only a molecule."
C.S. Lewis,
The Great Divorce

No man or woman of the humblest sort can really be strong, gentle, pure and good without the world being better for it, without somebody being helped and comforted by the very existence of that goodness.
Phillips Brooks

"God is all that is good, as I see it—and the goodness that all things have, it is He." 
Julian Of Norwich

What doth it profit thee to enter into deep discussions concerning the Holy Trinity, if thou lack humility, and be thus displeasing to the Trinity? For verily it is not deep words that make a man holy and upright; it is a good life which maketh a man dear to God. I had rather feel contrition than be skillful in the definition thereof. If thou knewest the whole Bible, and the sayings of all the philosophers, what should this profit thee without the love and grace of God? Thomas à Kempis

The first question which the priest and the Levite asked was: "If I stop to help this man, what will happen to me?" But... the good Samaritan reversed the question: "If I do not stop to help this man, what will happen to him?" 
Martin Luther King, Jr.

We are looking for our own virtue, our own piety, our own goodness, and so live on and in our own poverty and weakness -today pleased and comforted with the seeming firmness and strength of our own pious tempers and fancying ourselves to be somewhat. Tomorrow, fallen into our own mire, we are dejected, but not humbled; we grieve,

but it is only the grief of pride at the seeing our perfection not to be such as we had vainly imagined. And thus it will be, till the whole turn of our minds be so changed that we as fully see and know our inability to have any goodness of our own as to have a life of our own.
William Law

"Creator"–why did God create? He needed nothing, being perfect and eternal. There is only one possible motive: altruistic love, sheer generosity, the desire to share His goodness and glory with others.
Peter Kreeft

I have found the paradox that if I love until it hurts, then there is no hurt, but only more love.
Mother Teresa, The Simple Path

God has been very good to me, for I never dwell upon anything wrong which a person has done, so as to remember it afterwards. If I do remember it, I always see some other virtue in that person.
Saint Teresa of Avila

Do all the good you can. By all the means you can. In all the ways you can. In all the places you can. At all the times you can. To all the people you can. As long as ever you can.
John Wesley

The essence of the Christian faith…is that Jesus frees us from the “curse of the law.” We are forgiven and accepted just as we are, no longer burdened by an impossible weight of duty. But since we have been loved at such great cost, (“God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that all who believe I Him should not perish but have everlasting life,: John 3:16), we respond with grateful love in turn. Now we do our best to keep God’s law, because we are irresistibly drawn nearer his beauty and perfection.
Frederica Mathewes Green,
At The Corner of East and Now

"That is one of the functions of art: to present what the narrow and desperately practical perspectives of real life exclude."
C. S. Lewis

We are hurt; we are lonely; and we turn to music or words, and as compensation beyond all price we are given glimpses of the world on the other side of time and space. We all have glimpses of glory as children, and as we grow up we forget them, or are taught to think we made them up; they couldn't possibly have been real, because to most of us who are grown up, reality is like radium, and can be borne only in very small quantities. But we are meant to be real, and to see and recognize the real. We are all more than we know, and that wondrous reality, that wholeness, holiness, is there for all of us, not the qualified only.
Madeleine L'Engle, Walking on Water

Beauty is indeed a good gift of God; but that the good may not think it a great good, God dispenses it even to the wicked. 
Saint Augustine

Since love grows within you, so beauty grows. For love is the beauty of the soul.
Saint Augustine

"The simple act of an ordinary brave man is not to participate in lies,
not to support false actions! His rule: let that come into the world, let it even reign supreme--only not through me. But it is within the power of writers and artists to do much more: to defeat the lie! For in the struggle with lies art has always triumphed and shall always triumph! Visibly, irrefutably for all! Lies can prevail against much in this world, but never against art." 
Alexander I. Solzhenitsyn

"The only really effective apologia for Christianity comes down to two arguments, namely, the saints the Church has produced, and the art which has grown in her womb. Better witness is borne to the Lord by the splendor of holiness and art which have arisen in the community of believers than by the clever excuses which apologetics has come up with to justify the dark sides which, sadly, are so frequent in the Church's human history. If the Church is to continue to transform and humanize the world, how can she dispense with beauty in her liturgies, that beauty which is so closely linked with love and with the radiance of the Resurrection? No. Christians must not be too easily satisfied. They must make their Church into a place where beauty--and hence truth--is at home. Without this the world will become the first circle of Hell."
Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger (now Pope Benedict XVI) with Vittorio Messori, The Ratzinger Report

The arts help us to perceive and/or build connections everywhere.  By so doing, they allow us: a) to rebuild the sympathetic universe that the medievals saw and that Dante embodied most fully; 2) to see that Christ fulfills not only the Jewish Law/Prophets but all the deepest philosophical, theological, and aesthetic yearnings of mankind; 3) to be better evangelists and apologists through an ability to re-incarnate the Gospel in a variety of different cultures; 4) to praise God through a symphony of voices.
Louis Markos, Cornerstone Magazine, The Importance of the Arts to Christianity, posted June 25, 2003

The arts alone give direct access to experience. To eliminate them from education--or worse, to tolerate them as cultural ornaments--is antieducational obscurantism. It is foisted on us by the pedants and snobs of Hellenistic Greece who considered artistic performance fit only for slaves...-
Peter Drucker-- Landmarks of Tomorrow: A Report on the New 'Post-Modern' World (1959)

What C.S. Lewis called joy in this life is an image of heaven. Joy is the experience of wonder and love and longing for something that can't be defined, but which we can experience right now and find wonderfully fulfilling. Yet, by definition, it is a longing for more.
Peter Kreeft

We've reduced mystery to a temporary problem that can be solved by reason. The ancient mind that produced myth, and the medieval mind that produced both a Dante and an Aquinas, combined mystery and order. They combined the conviction that the universe can be understood at least partly by human reason, and that the universe itself and the ultimate reality behind it is endlessly mysterious. They combined that, but we separate them.  Some philosophers are rationalists, saying we can understand it all, and thus, there's no mystery. Some are irrationalists, saying it's all mystery. Those two halves of the human spirit haven't changed, but their relationship has. They have become disintegrated. Sometimes it's cynical and nihilistic, sometimes it's optimistic and romantic, sometimes it's just passionately existential-or something like that. What is often called the culture and the counterculture, and the classical versus romantic dualism of the nineteenth century, are all versions of that fundamental split.
Peter Kreeft

If Christianity is really true, then it involves the whole man, including his intellect and creativeness. Christianity is not just "dogmatically" true or "doctrinally" true. Rather, it is true to what is there, true in the whole area of the whole man in all of life. 
Francis Schaeffer,
Art and the Bible

The Christian is the one whose imagination should fly beyond the stars.
Francis Schaeffer,
Art and the Bible

The arts and the sciences do have a place in the Christian life -- they are not peripheral. For a Christian, redeemed by the work of Christ and living within the norms of Scripture and under the leadership of the Holy Spirit, the Lordship of Christ should include an interest in the arts. A Christian should use these arts to the glory of God -- not just as tracts, but as things of beauty to the praise of God. And art work can be a doxology in itself. 
Francis Schaeffer,
Art and the Bible

"The thought pierced him that in the end the Shadow was a small and passing thing:  there was Light and High Beauty forever beyond its reach."
J.R.R. Tolkien,
The Lord of the Rings

…What is human work but a participation in divine creation? What is leisure but an anticipation of the unlabored life of heaven? What does the artist do but restore creation to its divine origin and end? Beauty in all its material and practical expressions exists to draw humanity into the redeeming beauty of God. This is surely what Dostoevsky had in mind when one of his characters in The Idiot declares that "beauty will save the world."

…The Church today can play a role in bringing the arts back from alienation from the transcendent—an alienation that has led the arts themselves into severe disorientation and crisis. Church art programs can elevate and ennoble what beauty exists in the human city and among its artists and poets.
Monsignor M. Francis Mannion, The Church and The City, First Things, February 2000

I have learnt to love you late, Beauty at once so ancient and so new! 
Saint Augustine

Love is the beauty of the soul. 
Saint Augustine

What makes for a good, Christian movie? In brief, a good, Christian movie is one that is well-crafted and true. A film that does not strive for artistic and aesthetic excellence cannot be a good film. It will be a shoddy or uneven film, making whatever story or message is being told almost impossible to digest, no matter how biblically sound it is. Likewise, a film that does not bear allusive witness to the truth cannot be a good film. This phrase "allusive witness" is intentional, for we are not suggesting the evangelistic film. We're suggesting rather the film that witnesses allusively, obliquely, to the splendor of goodness, the shabbiness of sin, the hunger to be forgiven, the yearning for the divine, the playfulness of creation—all things true—in films such as Dead Man Walking, Glory, To Kill a Mockingbird, Blade Runner, Babette's Feast, Henry V, and Chariots of Fire.
W. David O. Taylor, Christianity Today, What Is a Good Christian Movie, Anyway?, posted 7/13/04

Beauty is a terrible and awful thing! It is terrible because it has not been fathomed, for God sets us nothing but riddles. Here the boundaries meet and all contradictions exist side by side.
Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov 

 

The awful thing is that beauty is mysterious as well as terrible. God and the devil are fighting there and the battlefield is the heart of man.

Fyodor Dostoevsky, The Brothers Karamazov

"One thing have I asked of the LORD,
that will I seek after:
that I may dwell in the house of the LORD
all the days of my life,
to gaze upon the beauty of the LORD
and to inquire in his temple.
A Psalm of David

By a curious blend of these currents of religious faith and scholarship with the no less powerful influences of skepticism and religious relativism, the universality-with-particularity of Jesus has thus become an issue not only for Christians in the 20th century, but for humanity. As respect for the organized church has declined, reverence for Jesus has grown. For the unity and variety of the portraits of "Jesus through the centuries’’ has demonstrated that there is more in him than is dreamt of in the philosophy and Christology of the theologians. Within the church, but also far beyond its walls, his person and message are, in the phrase of Augustine, a "beauty ever ancient, ever new," and now he belongs to the world.
Jaroslav Pelikan,  Jesus Through the Centuries  

"It was when I was happiest that I longed most...The sweetest thing in all my life has been the longing...to find the place where all the beauty came from."
C.S. Lewis, Till We Have Faces

If God counts the hairs of each of their heads, if none are excluded from the salvation the Crucifixion offers, who will venture to exclude them from earthly blessings and esteem; pronounce this life unnecessary, that one better terminated or never begun? I never experienced so perfect a sense of human equality as with Mother Teresa among her poor. Her love for them, reflecting God's love, makes them equal, as brothers and sisters within a family are equal, however widely they differ in intellectual and other attainments, in physical beauty and grace.
Malcolm Muggeridge,  Something Beautiful for God

Imagination disposes of everything; it creates beauty, justice, and happiness, which are everything in this world. 
Blaise Pascal

"By the words 'Christian Art' I do not mean Church art...I mean Christian art in the sense of art which bears within it the character of Christianity...It is the art of redeemed humanity."

--Jacques Maritain, "Christian Art," Art & Scholasticism

Liturgy is like a strong tree whose beauty is derived from the continuous renewal of its leaves, but whose strength comes from the old trunk, with solid roots in the ground. 
Pope Paul VI

 1Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, as clear as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb 2down the middle of the great street of the city. On each side of the river stood the tree of life, bearing twelve crops of fruit, yielding its fruit every month. And the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations. 3No longer will there be any curse. The throne of God and of the Lamb will be in the city, and his servants will serve him. 4They will see his face, and his name will be on their foreheads. 5There will be no more night. They will not need the light of a lamp or the light of the sun, for the Lord God will give them light. And they will reign for ever and ever. 6The angel said to me, "These words are trustworthy and true. The Lord, the God of the spirits of the prophets, sent his angel to show his servants the things that must soon take place."
Revelation 22
 


C.S. Lewis Quotes
 

The Chinese also speak of a great thing (the greatest thing) called the Tao. It is the reality beyond all predicates, the abyss that was before the Creator Himself. It is Nature, it is the Way, the Road... It is also the Way which every man should tread in imitation of that cosmic and supercosmic progression, conforming all activities to that great exemplar. 'In ritual,' say the Analects, 'it is harmony with Nature that is prized.' The ancient Jews likewise praise the Law as being 'true'.

This conception in all its forms, Platonic, Aristotelean, Christian, and Oriental alike, I shall henceforth refer to for brevity simply as 'the Tao'. Some of the accounts of it which I have quoted will seem, perhaps, to many of you as merely quaint or even magical. But what is common to them all…is the doctrine of objective value, the belief that certain attitudes are really true, and others are really false, to the kind of thing the universe is and the kind of things we are.
The Abolition of Man
(New York: Macmillan, 1955), p. 28-29.

The idea . . . that Christianity brought a new ethical code into the world is a grave error. If it had done so, then we should have to conclude that all who first preached it wholly misunderstood their own message: for all of them, its Founder, His precursor, His apostles, came demanding repentance and offering forgiveness, a demand and an offer both meaningless except on the assumption of a moral law already known and already broken.
"On Ethics," Christian Reflections, ed.  Walter Hooper (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1967), p. 46.

At his most characteristic, medieval man was not a dreamer or a wanderer. He was an organiser, a codifier, a builder of systems. He wanted "a place for everything and everything in the right place". Distinction, definition, tabulation were his delight . . . Highly original and soaring philosophical speculation squeezes itself into a rigid dialectical pattern copied from Aristotle. Studies like Law and Moral Theology, which demand the ordering of very diverse particulars, especially flourish . . . There was nothing which medieval people liked better, or did better, than sorting out and tidying up . . . The perfect examples are the Summa of Aquinas and Dante's Divine Comedy; as unified and ordered as the Parthenon or the Oedipus Rex, as crowded and varied as a London terminus on a bank holiday.
The Discarded Image (New York:  Cambridge University Press, 1964), p. 10.

The Christin religion…does not begin in comfort; it begins in…dismay.…In religion, as in war and everything else, comfort is the one thing you cannot get by looking for it. If you look for truth, you may find comfort in the end: If you look for comfort you will not get either comfort or truth-only soft soap and wishful thinking to begin with and, in the end, despair.
Mere Christianity
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 39.

If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning: just as, if there were no light in the universe and therefore no creatures with eyes, we should never know it was dark.  Dark would be without meaning.
Mere Christianity
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 46.

"Pleasure, money, power, and safety are all, as far as they go, good things. The badness consists in pursuing them by the wrong method, or in the wrong way, or too much. I do not mean, of course, that the people who do this are not desperately wicked. I do mean that wickedness, when you examine it, turns out to be the pursuit of some good in the wrong way. You can be good for the mere sake of goodness: you cannot be bad for the mere sake of badness. You can do a kind action when you are not feeling kind and when it gives you no pleasure, simply because kindness is right; but no one ever did a cruel action simply because cruelty is wrong--only because cruelty was pleasant or useful to him. In other words badness cannot succeed even in being bad in the same way in which goodness is good. Goodness is, so to speak, itself: badness is only spoiled goodness. And there must be something good first before it can be spoiled. We called sadism a sexual perversion; but you must first have the idea of a normal sexuality before you can talk of its being perverted; and you can see which is the perversion, because you can explain the perverted from the normal, and cannot explain the normal from the perverted."
Mere Christianity (New York: McMillan, 1952),  pp. 49-50.

…God designed the human machine to run on Himself. He Himself is the fuel our spirits were designed to burn, or the food our spirits were designed to feed on. There is no other. . . . God cannot give us a happiness and peace apart from Himself, because it is not there. There is no such thing.
Mere Christianity
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 54.

"I am trying to prevent anyone saying the really foolish thing that people often say about Him: "I'm ready to accept Jesus as a great moral teacher, but I don't accept His claim to be God." That is the one thing we must not say. A man who was merely a man and said the sort of things Jesus said would not be a great moral teacher. He would either be a lunatic ­ on a level with the man who says he is a poached egg ­ or else he would be the Devil of Hell. You must make your choice. Either this man was, and is, the Son of God; or else a madman or something worse. You can shut Him up for a fool, you can spit at Him and kill him as a demon; or you can fall at His feet and call Him Lord and God. But let us not come with any patronizing nonsense about His being a great human teacher. He has not left that open to us. He did not intend to."
Mere Christianity
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  pp. 55-56.

 …Faith, in the sense in which I am here using the word, is the art of holding on to things your reason has once accepted, in spite of your changing moods. For moods will change, whatever view your reason takes. I know that by experience."
Mere Christianity (New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 123.

It cost God nothing, so far as we know, to create nice things: but to convert rebellious wills cost Him crucifixion.
Mere Christianity
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 179.

…the question whether miracles occur can never be answered simply by experience. Every event which might claim to be a miracle is, in the last resort, something presented to our senses, something seen, heard, touched, smelled, or tasted. And our senses are not infallible. If anything extraordinary seems to have happened, we can always say that we have been the victims of an illusion. If we hold a philosophy which excludes the supernatural, this is what we always shall say. What we learn from experience depends on the kind of philosophy we bring to experience. It is therefore useless to appeal to experience before we have settled, as well as we can, the philosophical question.
Miracles
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 3.

Thus no thoroughgoing Naturalist believes in free will: for free will would mean that human beings have the power of independent action, the power of doing something more or other than what was involved by the total series of events. And any such separate power of originating events is what the Naturalist denies. Spontaneity, originality, action 'on its own', is a privilege reserved for 'the whole show', which he calls Nature.
Miracles
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 7.

The difference between Naturalism and Supernaturalism is not exactly the same as the difference between belief in a God and disbelief. Naturalism, without ceasing to be itself, could admit a certain kind of God. The great interlocking event called Nature might be such as to produce at some stage a great cosmic consciousness, an indwelling 'God' arising from the whole process as human mind arises (according to the Naturalists) from human organisms. A Naturalist would not object to that sort of God. ..Such a God would not stand outside Nature or the total system, would not be existing “on his own.” …What Naturalism cannot accept is the idea of a God who stands outside Nature and made it.
Miracles
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  pp. 8-9.

It follows that no account of the universe can be true unless that account leaves it possible for our thinking to be a real insight. A theory which explained everything else in the whole universe but which made it impossible to believe that our thinking was valid, would be utterly out of court. For that theory would itself have been reached by thinking, and if thinking is not valid that theory would, of course, be itself demolished. It would have destroyed its own credentials. It would be an argument which proved that no argument was sound--a proof that there are no such things as proofs--which is nonsense.

Miracles (New York: McMillan, 1952),  pp. 14-15.

 

Thus strict materialism refutes itself for the reason given long ago by Professor Haldane: “If my mental processes are determined wholly by the motions of atoms in my brain, I have no reason to believe my beliefss are true…and hence I have no reason for supposing my brain to be composed of atoms. “
(Possible Worlds, p. 209)

 

Naturalism…seems to me to invole the same difficulty. It discredits our process of reasoning or at least reduces their credit to such a humble level that it can no longer support Naturalism itself.

Miracles (New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 15.

 

Bacon warned us long ago that 'the human understanding is of its own nature prone to suppose the existence of more order and regularity in the world than it finds. And though there be many things which are singular and unmatched, yet it devises for them parallels and conjugates and relatives which do not exist. Hence the fiction that all celestial bodies move in perfect circles' (Novum Organum, I. 45). I think Bacon was right. Science itself has already made reality appear less homogeneous than we expected it to be: Newtonian atomism was much more the sort of thing we expected (and desired) than Quantum physics.
Miracles
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 27.

Human minds, then, are not the only supernatural entities that exist. They do not come from nowhere. Each has come into Nature from Supernature: each has its tap-root in an eternal, self-existent, rational Being, whom we call God. Each is an offshoot, or spearhead, or incursion of that Supernatural reality into Nature.
Miracles
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 28.

The various and complex conditions under which Reason and Morality appear are the twists and turns of the frontier between Nature and Supernature. That is why, if you wish, you can always ignore Supernature and treat the phenomena purely from the Natural side; just as a man studying on a map the boundaries of Cornwall and Devonshire can always say, 'What you call a bulge in Devonshire is really a dent in Cornwall'. And in a sense you can't refute him. What we call a bulge in Devonshire always is a dent in Cornwall. What we call rational thought in a man always involves a state of the brain, in the long run a relation of atoms. But Devonshire is none the less something more than 'where Cornwall ends', and Reason is something more than cerebral bio-chemistry. Miracles (New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 40.

A society where the simple many obey the few seers can live: a society where all were seers could live even more fully. But a society where the mass is still simple and the seers are no longer attended to can achieve only superficiality, baseness, ugliness, and in the end extinction. On or back we must go; to stay here is death.
Miracles
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 43.

Our question could, if you liked, be put in the form, 'Does Supernature ever produce particular results in space and time except through the instrumentality of human brains acting on human nerves and muscles'.

I have said “particular results” because, on our view, Nature as a whole is herself one huge result of the Supernatural: God created her. God pierces her wherever there is a human mind. God presumably maintains her in existence. The question is whether He ever does anything else to her. Does He, besides all this, ever introduce into her events of which it would not be true to say, 'This is simply the working out of the general character which He gave to Nature as a whole in creating her'? Such events are what are popularly called Miracles: and it will be in this sense only that the word Miracle will be used for the rest of the book.
Miracles
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  pp. 43-44.

All records of miracles teach the same thing. In such stories the miracles excite fear and wonder (that is what the very word miracle implies) among the spectators, and are taken as evidence of supernatural power. If they were not known to be contrary to the laws of nature how could they suggest the presence of the supernatural? How could they be surprising unless they were seen to be exceptions to the rules? And how can anything be seen to be an exception till the rules are known? If there ever were men who did not know the laws of nature at all, they would have no idea of a miracle and feel no particular interest in one if it were performed before them. Nothing can seem extraordinary until you have discovered what is ordinary.
Miracles
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 47.

 

If it is maintained that anything so small as the Earth must, in any event, be too unimportant to merit the love of the Creator, we reply that no Christian ever supposed we did merit it. Christ did not die for men because they were intrinsically worth dying for, but because He is intrinsically love, and therefore loves infinitely. And what, after all, does the size of a world or a creature tell us about its 'importance' or value?Miracles (New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 52.

 

The divine art of miracles is not an art of suspending the pattern to which events conform but of feeding new events into that pattern.
Miracles
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 60.

 

To find that all the woods, and small streams in the middle of the woods, and odd corners of mountain valleys, and the wind and the grass were only a sort of scenery, only backcloths for some kind of play, and that play perhaps one with a moral--what flatness, what an anticlimax, what an unendurable bore! [p. 78] 64

We have now three guiding principles before us. (1) That thought is distinct from the imagination which accompanies it. (2) That thought may be in the main sound even when the false images that accompany it are mistaken by the thinker for true ones. (3) That anyone who talks about things that cannot be seen, or touched, or heard, or the like, must inevitably talk as if they could be seen or touched or heard (e.g. must talk of 'complexes' and 'repressions' as if desires could really be tied up in bundles or shoved back; of 'growth' and 'development' as if institution could really grow like trees or unfold like flowers; of energy being 'released' as if it where an animal let out of a cage).
Miracles (New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 73.

 

God is basic Fact or Actuality, the source of all other facthood. At all costs therefore He must not be thought of as a featureless generality. If He exists at all, He is the most concrete thing there is, the most individual, “organised and minutely articulated.” He is unspeakable not by being indefinite but by being too definite for the unavoidable vagueness of language. The words incorporeal and impersonal are misleading, because they suggest that He lacks some reality which we posses. It would be safer to call His trans-corporeal, trans-personal.

Miracles (New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 91.

 

If the ultimate Fact is not an abstraction but the living God, opaque by the very fulness of His blinding actuality, then He might do things. He might work miracles. But would He? Many people of sincere piety feel that He would not. They think it unworthy of Him. It is petty and capricious tyrants who break their own laws: good and wise kinds obey them. Only an incompetent workman will produce work which needs to be interfered with.  And people who believe in this way are not satisfied by the assurances given in Chapter VIII that miracles do not, in fact, break the laws of nature... This feeling springs from deep and noble sources in the mind and must always be treated with respect. Yet it is, I believe ,  founded on an error.
Miracles
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 95.

 

To be sure, God might be expected to make a better story than my friend. But it is a very long story, with a complicated plot; and we are not, perhaps, very attentive readers.
Miracles
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 99.

In the Christian story God descends to reascend. He comes down . . . down to the very roots and sea-bed of the Nature He has created. But He goes down to come up again and bring the whole ruined world up with Him.
Miracles
(New York: McMillan, 1952),  p. 111.

The doctrine of the Incarnation …digs beneath the surface, works through the rest of our knowledge by unexpected channels, harmonises best with our deepest apprehensions and our “second thoughts”. . . illuminates and orders all other phenomena, explains both our laughter and our logic, our fear of the dead and our knowledge that it is somehow good to die, and which at one stroke covers what multitudes of separate theories will hardly cover for us if this is rejected.
Miracles (New York: Macmillan, 1947), p. 131.

The Resurrection is the central theme in every Christian sermon reported in Acts. The Resurrection, and its consequences, were the “gospel” or good news which the Christians brought: what we call the “gospels,” the narratives of our Lord’s live and death, were composed later for the benefit of those who had already accepted the gospel.
Miracles
(New York: Macmillan, 1947), pp. 143-144.

…I think our present outlook might be like that of a small boy who, on being told that the sexual act was the highest bodily pleasure should immediately ask whether you ate chocolates at the same time. On receiving the answer 'No', he might regard absence of chocolates as the chief characteristic of sexuality. In vain would you tell him that the reason why lovers in their carnal raptures don't bother about chocolates is that they have something better to think of. The boy knows chocolate: he does not know the positive thing that excludes it. We are in the same position. We know the sexual life; we do not know, except in glimpses, the other thing which, in Heaven, will leave no room for it.

Miracles (New York: Macmillan, 1947), p. 160.

 

Most of our prayers, if fully analysed, ask either for a miracle or an event whose foundations will have to have been laid before I was born, indeed, laid when the universe began. But then to God (though not to me) I and the prayer I make in 1945 were just as much present at the creation of the world as they are now and will be a million years hence. God’s creative act is timeless…

Miracles (New York: Macmillan, 1947), p. 178.

Chronicles of Narnia

"And may I ask, O Lucy, Daughter of Eve," said Mr. Tumnus, "how you have come into Narnia?"

"Narnia? What's that?" said Lucy.

"This is the land of Narnia," said the Faun, "where we are now; all that lies between the lamppost and the great castle of Cair Paravel on the Eastern Sea."   
The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe
(New York: Macmillan, 1970), p. 10.

"There are only three possibilities. Either your sister is telling lies, or she is mad, or she is telling the truth. You know she doesn't tell lies and it is obvious she is not mad. For the moment then and unless any further evidence turns up, we must assume she is telling the truth."
The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe
(New York: Macmillan, 1970), p. 45.

“Who is Aslan?” asked Susan.

“Aslan?” said Mr. Beaver. Why don’t you know? He’s the King. He’s the Lord of the whole wood…

“Is he a man?” asked Lucy.

“Aslan a man!” said Mr. Beaver sternly. “Certainly not. I tell you he is the King of the wood and the son of the great Emperor-Beyond-the-Sea. Don’t you know who is the King of Beasts? Aslan is a lion-the Lion, the great Lion.”…

“Then he isn’t safe?” said Lucy.

“Safe?” said Mr. Beaver. “Don’t you hear what Mrs. Beaver tells you? Who said anything about safe? ‘Course he isn’t safe. But he’s good. He’s the King, I tell you.
The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe
(New York: Macmillan, 1970), pp. 74-76.

"'…when a willing victim who had committed no treachery was killed in a traitor's stead, the table would crack and Death itself would start working backwards.
The Lion, The Witch and the Wardrobe
(New York: Macmillan, 1970), p. 160.

“Why have all your follower drawn their swords, may I ask?’ said Aslan.

“May it please your high majesty,: said the second mouse, whose name was Peepiceek, “we are all waiting to cut off our tails if our Chief must go without his. We will not bear the shame of wearing an honour which is denied to the High Mouse.”

“Ah” roared Aslan,”you have conquered me. You have great hearts. Not for the sake of your dignity, Reepicheep, but for the love that is between you and your people, and still more for the kindness your people showed me long ago when you ate away the cords that bound me on the stone table (and it was then, though you have long forgotten, that you became talking mice) you shall have your tail again.”
Prince Caspian
(New York: Macmillan, 1970), p. 203.

"'You come of the Lord Adam and the Lady Eve,” said Aslan. “And that is both honour enough to erect the head of the poorest beggar, and shame enough to bow the shoulders of the greatest emperor in earth.”

Prince Caspian (New York: Macmillan, 1970), pp. 211-212.
 

“The King who owned this island,” said Caspian slowly, and his face flushed as he spoke, “would soon be the richest of all kings in the world. I claim this land forever as a Narnian possession. It shall be called Goldwater Island. And I bind all you to secrecy. No one must know of this. Not even Drinian-on pain of death, do your hear?”
 

“Who are you talking to?” said Edmund. “I’m no subject of yours. If anything it’s the other way around. I am one of the four ancient sovereigns of Narnia and you are under allegiance to the High King my brother.”
 

“So it has come to that, King Edmund, has it?” said Caspian, laying his hand on his sword-hilt…
 

“Sire,” said Reepicheep, “this is a place with a curse on it. Let us get back on board at once. And if I ever have the honour of naming this island, I should call it Deathwater.”

The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, (New York: Macmillan, 1952), pp. 105-106.

 

“Supposing I told you I’d been in a place where animals can talk and where there are—er—enchantments and dragons—and, well, all sorts of things you have in fairy tales.” Scrubb felt terribly awkward as he said this and got red in the face.
“How do you get there?” said Jill. She also felt curiously shy.
“The only way you can—by Magic,” said Eustace almost in a whisper.
The Silver Chair (New York: Macmillan, 1970), p. 5.

 

Suppose we have only dreamed, or made up, all those things-- trees and grass and sun and moon and stars and Aslan himself. Suppose we have. Then all I can say is that, in that case, the made-up things seem a good deal more important than the real ones. Suppose this black pit of a kingdom of yours is the only world. Well, it strikes me as a pretty poor one. And that's a funny thing, when you come to think of it. We're just babies making up a game, if you're right. But four babies playing a game can make a play world, which licks your real world hollow. That's why I'm going to stand by the play world. I'm on Aslan's side, even if there isn't any Aslan to lead it. I’m going to live as like a Narnian as I can even if there isn’t any Narnia.
The Silver Chair (New York: Macmillan, 1970), p. 159.

But I cannot tell that to this old sinner, and I cannot comfort him either; he has made himself unable to hear my voice. If I spoke to him, he would hear only growlings and roarings. Oh Adam’s sons, how cleverly you defend yourselves against all that might do you good! But I will give him the only gift he is still able to receive.”

He bowed his great head rather sadly, and breathed into the Magician’s terrified face. “Sleep,” he said. “Sleep and be separated for some few hours from all the torments you have devised for yourself.” Uncle Andrew immediately rolled over with closed eyes and began breathing peacefully.  The Magician’s Nephew (New York: Macmillan, 1970), p. 185.

"'When Aslan said you could never go back to Narnia, he meant the Narnia you were thinking of. But that was not the real Narnia. That had a beginning and an end. It was only a shadow or a copy of the real Narnia which has always been there and always will be there: just as our own world, England and all, is only a shadow or copy of something in Aslan's real world. You need not mourn over Narnia, Lucy. All of the old Narnia that mattered, all the dear creatures, have been drawn into the real Narnia through the Door. And of course it is different; as different as a real thing is from a shadow or as waking life is from a dream.'"

The Last Battle (New York: Macmillan, 1970), pp. 169-170.
 

“I have come home at last! This is my real country. I belong here. This is the land I have been looking for all my life, though I never knew it till now. The reason why we loved the old Narnia is that it sometimes looked a bit like this…’

The Last Battle (New York: Macmillan, 1970), p. 171.

Gender is a reality, and a more fundamental reality than sex. Sex is, in fact, merely the adaptation to organic life of a fundamental polarity which divides all created beings.
Perelandra (
New York: Macmillan, 1943), p. 200.

The reason for not living on the Fixed Land is now so plain. How could I wish to live there except because it was Fixed? And why should I desire the fixed except to make sure –to be able to command one day where I would be the next and what should happen to me? It was to reject the wave-to draw my hands out of Maledil’s, to say to Him, ‘Not thus, but thus’-to put in our own power what times should roll toward us…as if you gathered fruits togethe to-dayfor tomorrow’s eating instead of taking what came. That would have been cold love and feeble trust. And out of it how could we ever have climbed back into love and trust again?”
Perelandra ( New York: Macmillan, 1943), p. 208.

A recovery of the old sense of sin is essential to Christianity. Christ takes it for granted that men are bad. Until we really feel this assumption of His we are part of the world He came to save…
The Problem of Pain
,  (New York: Macmillan, 1962), p. 57.

...it is...a poor thing to come to Him as a last resort, to offer up "our own" when it is no longer worth keeping. If God were proud He would hardly have us on such terms: but He is not proud, He stoops to conquer, He will have us even though we have shown that we prefer everything else to Him,